Skip to content

We don’t need your charity

James O’Keefe single-handedly exposed big bad ACORN and their despicable practices of telling complete strangers that pimping is easy. (It ain’t, although there is some debate on the matter.) But then he got himself caught not-very-subtly recording his pals trying to do something-or-other to Sen. Landreiu’s phones. It’s still a little unclear what they were actually trying to do; maybe trying to protect the Senator’s staff from a virulent disease transmitted via dirty telephones?

They’re claiming that they were trying to embarrass/expose her:

Four men charged with trying to tamper with a senator’s phones — including a conservative activist known for targeting ACORN — hoped to record embarrassing hidden camera footage to document allegations her staff was ignoring calls critical of her stance on health care reform, an attorney for one of the four said Thursday.

The theory, I guess, was to disable the office phones and then catch the staff joyously crying out, “Ha ha, those dumbass constituents won’t be able to call us now!” There are two major problems with this. The first is that it’s a really dumb plan. Their hidden camera would be more likely to expose staffers saying “shit, how are we going to order pizza now?” Of course, nobody will ever suspect the guys who just came in and fiddled with the phones, nor the guy recording footage of them on his cell phone. It just seems like kind of a high-risk plan to try to social-engineer your way into an office on the off-chance that staffers will say something you can spin against them.

The second problem, of course, is that Democrats don’t need help embarrassing themselves.

A new initiative

I know that we haven’t been blogging much, and that what little blogging we have done has had minimal impact. We started out OK but left you hanging after our first year. That is unacceptable, but we are proud to announce a solution: a writing freeze.

We look forward to the blogging recovery that will inevitably result from our steadfast refusal to do any non-essential writing.

  1. Diapadion | January 26, 2010 at 8:31 am | Permalink

    I staunchly disapprove, but at least I’m not paying your domain fees…

Cheap thought

Some people are making a lot of noise about President Obama’s bowing to Emperor Akihito, saying that it shows weakness and deference. I agree. Showing respect is something that pansy socialists do. It’s crucial that our President assert dominance over other cultures, like Bush did with Merkel.

Missed opportunity for irony

Word is that John King will take Lou Dobbs’s time slot at CNN.

Damn. I was pulling for Rick Sanchez.

Indians defeat White Sox in stunning rejection of Obama’s socialist agenda

The 5-1 loss Wednesday was symbolic of the intense disapproval of Barack Obama by Cleveland voters, by Indians, and by the other kind of Indians. Travis Hafner’s 6th-inning home run was an unmistakable rejection of the public option, as well as irrefutable proof that the so-called “President” was, in fact, born in Kenya.

The game was the 82nd loss for the White Sox, thus clinching a losing season, further evidence that the Age of Obama is now over.

/insert flashing siren here

In related news, Obama turned down an offer of seconds at lunch on Friday afternoon, stating that he was full. Is Obama trying to do too much? Tune in tonight for thoughts on whether the President has overextended and endangered his agenda.

Indeed, there are people this ridiculous!

  1. Aerion | October 2, 2009 at 11:28 pm | Permalink

    BREAKING NEWS: White Sox defeat Tigers, 8-0 on Friday night. Is Barack Obama trying to destroy the American car industry? IT SURE SEEMS LIKE IT.

Before you bring on my two attorneys…

I’ve been ripping on Strategic Vision, LLC, since before it was cool. Well, actually, it was cool back then to rip on them. It was even cool back in 2006. But now it’s cool again.

October 1, 2008:

12:59 <yevrah> most recent ppp, q, cnn show obama in the lead, susa m+1, rasmussen tied, strategic m+3
12:59 <Aerion> and seriously, strategic vision can eat it

October 9, 2008:

01:51 <Aerion> Chambliss 47, Martin 44
01:51 <yevrah_> so awesome
01:51 <Aerion> but wait, there's more!!
01:51 <Aerion> the trend is absurd!
01:51 <Aerion> i mean, strategic vision kind of sucks
01:51 <Aerion> but 57-28 ... to 47-44!?

November 3, 2008:

15:42 <PollBot> ** StrategicVision: PA, WA, WI (10/31-11/2)
15:43 <Aerion> ok, but fuck strategic vision
15:43 <nepharis> heh

I had always assumed it was just gross incompetence that led them to be generally wrong all the time, and that their secrecy was just paranoia or something. Or perhaps just a necessary side effect of the fact that they’re not impartial, but that they’re actually political strategists. (As I recall, most outfits labeled them with an (R) and considered their polls to be internals.) But I don’t think I suspected that they might (note: might) have just been wholesale making  shit up, as Nate Silver almost-sort-of-accuses.

When I read Nate’s post this morning, I was naturally a little skeptical. It’s a little surprising to me that the trailing digit of polling data actually should be random. I’d have guessed a little more bias towards 9, considering pollsters tend to like to poll close races with top lines like 48-47. It’s hard to argue with the pretty graph showing all pollsters’ results, though.

But you know what? Forget the math. There’s two big things that stick out for me as serious red flags.

The first red flag: Strategic Vision’s response to the AAPOR complaint that originally prompted Nate’s investigation. Says CEO David Johnson:

We will be taking legal action.  We have spoken with our attorneys and have gotten them the documentation and should know exactly the venue and specific charges that we will be filing against AAPOR specifically and individual members of AAPOR personally.

Such quick escalation to legal threats makes you look a lot worse than you already did. Especially when you levy said threats them against thoroughly nonthreatening organizations like AAPOR, whose primary weapon is mildly irritated letters. Belligerence betrays malfeasance. Almost always.

The second (much less important) red flag: Really? strategicvision.biz? Unless you’re selling your polling services on infomercials on the Game Show Network, that’s probably not an appropriate domain. Here’s ten bucks, go buy yourself a dot com.

(The title of this post is in reference to this belligerent blast from the past. Also, I had forgotten about the random Total Recall clip in that segment, so that’s kind of an added bonus.)

  1. Aerion | September 26, 2009 at 2:08 am | Permalink

    Two attorneys? That’s pretty pimp.

Tweet for Twat

Joe Wilson has apparently hired a “professional Tweeter”. Whatever the hell that means. (Perhaps Eric Cantor could have used one of those, so that he could have paid attention to Obama’s speech instead of Blackberrying the whole time.)

Set aside for now the horrible idea that there might actually be people who get paid to use Twitter. I’ve long been baffled by the conservative movement’s complete obsession with Twitter, as if it is a panacea for all manner of self-inflicted wounds. Twitter has its uses (…sort of), but hiring someone else to Tweet on your behalf eliminates the two-way communication aspect of Twitter, effectively reducing your feed to a series of press releases, except very short and missing key vowels.

I don’t understand at all what tweeting is supposed to accomplish for Joe Wilson. The cynic in me says it’s just a way for him to constantly remind his followers to please give him money (or rather, “plz send $$ #tcot”). But even if a Twitter feed might help him push back against the onslaught of attacks from horrible fire-breathing liberals, does he really need a professional to help him? Even if he’s too dumb to figure out how a keyboard works, surely one of his staffers could do it for him?

Still in Town Hall mode?

Rep. Joe Wilson (SC-02) interrupted President Obama’s address to Congress tonight to call him a liar. He’s already apologized. Who knows, Democrats might even punish him by giving him mean looks and not talking to him for a while.

This differs from the standard Republican punishment for Joe Wilson, which would be to ruin his wife’s career.

  1. Legion | September 19, 2009 at 9:09 pm | Permalink

    Now, now. I hear Barney Frank may volunteer to speak uncharacteristically nicely to the congressman if it might make him feel better.

Fascism, Defined

From Wikipedia, quoting American historian Robert Paxton’s latest book, Anatomy of Fascism (emphases mine):

…a form of political behavior marked by obsessive preoccupation with community decline, humiliation or victimhood and by compensatory cults of unity, energy and purity, in which a mass-based party of committed nationalist militants, working in uneasy but effective collaboration with traditional elites, abandons democratic liberties and pursues with redemptive violence and without ethical or legal restraints goals of internal cleansing and external expansion.

Sound familiar?

Cheap Thought

Maybe Chuck Grassley can use the money he’s going to be slicing out of poor people’s health care subsidies to buy himself some vowels.