Skip to content

Tweet for Twat

Joe Wilson has apparently hired a “professional Tweeter”. Whatever the hell that means. (Perhaps Eric Cantor could have used one of those, so that he could have paid attention to Obama’s speech instead of Blackberrying the whole time.)

Set aside for now the horrible idea that there might actually be people who get paid to use Twitter. I’ve long been baffled by the conservative movement’s complete obsession with Twitter, as if it is a panacea for all manner of self-inflicted wounds. Twitter has its uses (…sort of), but hiring someone else to Tweet on your behalf eliminates the two-way communication aspect of Twitter, effectively reducing your feed to a series of press releases, except very short and missing key vowels.

I don’t understand at all what tweeting is supposed to accomplish for Joe Wilson. The cynic in me says it’s just a way for him to constantly remind his followers to please give him money (or rather, “plz send $$ #tcot”). But even if a Twitter feed might help him push back against the onslaught of attacks from horrible fire-breathing liberals, does he really need a professional to help him? Even if he’s too dumb to figure out how a keyboard works, surely one of his staffers could do it for him?

Still in Town Hall mode?

Rep. Joe Wilson (SC-02) interrupted President Obama’s address to Congress tonight to call him a liar. He’s already apologized. Who knows, Democrats might even punish him by giving him mean looks and not talking to him for a while.

This differs from the standard Republican punishment for Joe Wilson, which would be to ruin his wife’s career.

Fascism, Defined

From Wikipedia, quoting American historian Robert Paxton’s latest book, Anatomy of Fascism (emphases mine):

…a form of political behavior marked by obsessive preoccupation with community decline, humiliation or victimhood and by compensatory cults of unity, energy and purity, in which a mass-based party of committed nationalist militants, working in uneasy but effective collaboration with traditional elites, abandons democratic liberties and pursues with redemptive violence and without ethical or legal restraints goals of internal cleansing and external expansion.

Sound familiar?

Cheap Thought

Maybe Chuck Grassley can use the money he’s going to be slicing out of poor people’s health care subsidies to buy himself some vowels.

Victimhood

Maybe the only way for Democrats to be as effective in turning out their base is for their ideological (not political) leaders to whip up their core voters into the same state of perpetual victimhood that Republican leaders have been fomenting for the last 16 years (“The liberal media! The liberal media!”). Even if it’s necessary, it’s depressing as hell.

Cheap Thought

Sanford in 2012? He could run on a platform of experience in foreign relations.

Pot. Kettle.

I guess in this case, the kettle is actually a black dude. Karl Rove accuses Obama of running a permanent campaign in the White House:

Team Obama is suffering from Extended Campaign Syndrome. In an election, campaign staffers are often just trying to survive until the next week or the next primary. They cut corners because they are fatigued or under pressure. They can be purposely combative and even portray critics as enemies.

I just don’t even know what to say.

I have a question relavant to this discussion

Yesterday, Arlen Specter took a beating at his town halls. I think the actions of his enraged constituents continue to support the hypothesis that they are not so much against health care, as they are against Barack Obama, no matter what he does. From the article, quoting the leader of the local Tea Party Blaggers:

“We believe there are several issues out there that leave the existence of the Republic at risk,” he added, “not the least of which is this Obamacare.”

For one thing, the use of the term “Obamacare”, just like the “Hillarycare” of 16 years ago, focuses opposition on a particular person, rather than on any ideas behind the plan.

But the main question is, what’s all this talk about the end of the Republic? It’s an increasingly popular refrain at these town halls for people to become very animated and yell about the Constitution being trampled, the country being at risk, the Democrats being un-American, and even weird, somewhat-dated references:

“This is about the dismantling of this country,” Katy Abram, 35, shouted at Mr. Specter, drawing one of the most prolonged rounds of applause. “We don’t want this country to turn into Russia.”

(Psst. Russia is old news. The new Evil Communist Regime is China. You might want to write that down.)

So, what’s all this talk about the dismantling of the country? What exactly are these imminent threats that spell the impending doom of western democracy?

And, fellow good citizens and patriots, because apparently you are so concerned about the Constitution and the country: where the FUCK were you guys when the Bush administration was illegally wiretapping American citizens and politicizing the judiciary!?

Cheap thought

I completely agree with the Republicans. Government officials should not insert themselves between a doctor and a patient’s family when it comes to end-of-life discussions.

B-Rock “The Islamic Shock” Hussein Superallah Obama

From crazy Russian dentist-realtor-lawyers melting down on cable TV, to people who don’t know what the word “fascist” means, but think the word sounds cool, to walking examples of Godwin’s Law, the public discourse, at least as portrayed in the media, has become irrational to the point where it can no longer be fairly called “discourse”.

Certainly, we have our fair share of crazies on the left, too. Those who were with me on a visit to Berkeley last spring got to hear in colorful terms exactly what I think of Code Pink, and especially what I think of Cindy Sheehan. (Oh, and Cynthia McKinney, too!) And I bet you’d almost forgotten about this awesome rant from the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee meeting last May…

OK, so our country is full of loud, stupid people. This may be the most shocking revelation since “college students drink”. But something about the town hall screamers makes them more than just crazy. These people, with their seemingly out-of-nowhere Hitler invocations, have crossed from mere insanity into actual malice. Left-wing protesters were often heard calling for Bush to be impeached and tried for war crimes. This was hailed by many on the right as being the ultimate in unpatriotic, America-hating, pinko Commie activity. But the protesters we’re seeing on the news these days are inciting violent threats against the party in power. Comparing Obama and Congressional Democrats to Nazis is particularly bad: the comparison is so out-of-place that it carries no legitimate rhetorical value, yet it paints the opponent as an enemy who must be defeated at all costs, including by extralegal means.

Funny how quickly things change… Many of these people were the type to become angry at TV comedians who made fun of George W. Bush, saying “he’s our President and he deserves our respect”. (No, he’s our President and he deserves to hear exactly what we think of him. And further, he ought to have a sense of humor about himself, because if he doesn’t, he’s liable to become a bitter shell of a man, like his Vice President.)

So what drives this hateful opposition? What motivates somebody to introduce a blatantly-forged Certificate of Live Muslim Kenyan Birth to a White Lady as evidence in a real court, in a real lawsuit? As much as I hate it when people overplay the racism card, the birther/secret Muslim movements do smack of racism, or at least of gross xenophobia.

Meanwhile, the town hall screamers and teabaggers are complaining about a perceived “socialist” bent, taking as an axiom that socialism is the Ulllltimaaaate Eeeeeviiiiiil. Shhhh! Nobody tell them about Medicare, unemployment benefits, corn subsidies, or public schools. Oh, or the bank bailout that the previous President started. Decades ago, they called anybody who disagreed with them “communist”. In the early 2000’s, “unpatriotic” and “un-American” were the popular accusations. A few months ago, “fascist” enjoyed a brief period of popularity, but “socialist” has been the catch-all for the last year, and looks to be going strong.

Anyway, I’m now seeing more and more media coverage (or maybe I’m just watching more MSNBC…) portraying the opposition for what it really is: GOP operatives who have no qualms about channeling and directing the irrational fears of a small group of Americans for political gain. And in the end, what the protests come down to isn’t people interested in upholding the “natural-born” clause of the Constitution, or people who are interested in honestly debating health care. They’re just people who have been goaded into openly expressing their fear of an African-American liberal. They’re conspiracy theorists who are afraid of Obama, because he’s black, and to the left. Black, and to the left. Black. And to the left.