<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Aggressively Uninformed &#187; Aerion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/author/aerion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com</link>
	<description>Deep thoughts and cheap shots</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:32:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A related, but less useful graph</title>
		<link>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/07/19/a-related-but-less-useful-graph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/07/19/a-related-but-less-useful-graph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 04:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aerion</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/?p=568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
But seriously, all the consternation in the media about Tiger being in some sort of slump is dumb. (I don&#8217;t mean to say that anyone here is engaging in that.)
He&#8217;ll be back. Remember 2004-ish, when he wasn&#8217;t doing so hot? He hadn&#8217;t won a major in two years. What happened? Laser show. Relax. Specifically, he made [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/one_leg1.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-571 aligncenter" title="one_leg" src="http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/one_leg1.png" alt="" width="450" height="320" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">But seriously, all the consternation in the media about Tiger being in some sort of slump is dumb. (I don&#8217;t mean to say that anyone here is engaging in that.)</p>
<p>He&#8217;ll be back. Remember 2004-ish, when he wasn&#8217;t doing so hot? He hadn&#8217;t won a major in <em>two years</em>. What happened? Laser show. Relax. Specifically, he made top 5 in ten of the next twelve majors, winning five of them. (Never mind that one where he missed the cut.) He tied for 4th at the Masters and U.S. Open this year, so he&#8217;s clearly still Really Good At Golf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/07/19/a-related-but-less-useful-graph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Experts on making black water</title>
		<link>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/06/01/experts-on-making-black-water/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/06/01/experts-on-making-black-water/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 04:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aerion</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/06/01/experts-on-making-black-water/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rather than cleaning up the mess, it might just be easier if BP changed its name to &#8220;Xe&#8221;.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than cleaning up the mess, it might just be easier if BP changed its name to &#8220;Xe&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/06/01/experts-on-making-black-water/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cheap thought</title>
		<link>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/05/21/cheap-thought-9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/05/21/cheap-thought-9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 16:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aerion</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/05/21/cheap-thought-9/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rand Paul has lots of black friends. Some of his best friends are black.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rand Paul has lots of black friends. Some of his best friends are black.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/05/21/cheap-thought-9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does it mean it&#8217;s shaped like a mushroom?</title>
		<link>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/05/14/does-it-mean-its-shaped-like-a-mushroom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/05/14/does-it-mean-its-shaped-like-a-mushroom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 07:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aerion</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/?p=547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[20% of respondents to a Zogby Interactive poll (yeah, yeah) this week said that they are not buying gas from BP because of the oil spill.
I think these people are making a very important statement. And that statement is, &#8220;Hey, everyone, I don&#8217;t understand what fungible means!&#8221;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>20% of respondents to a Zogby Interactive <a href="http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.cfm?ID=1861">poll</a> (yeah, yeah) this week said that they are not buying gas from BP because of the oil spill.</p>
<p>I think these people are making a very important statement. And that statement is, <a href="http://www.dilbert.com/strips/2006-02-19/">&#8220;Hey, everyone, I don&#8217;t understand what fungible means!&#8221;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/05/14/does-it-mean-its-shaped-like-a-mushroom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick test</title>
		<link>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/04/26/quick-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/04/26/quick-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 19:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aerion</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/04/26/quick-test/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In any immigration reform debate, I think there&#8217;s a quick test each participant should undergo: In a few sentences, explain why Mexican immigration should be limited.
Pencils down. Does your response contain the word &#8220;Spanish&#8221;? Congratulations, you might be racist!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In any immigration reform debate, I think there&#8217;s a quick test each participant should undergo: In a few sentences, explain why Mexican immigration should be limited.<br />
Pencils down. Does your response contain the word &#8220;Spanish&#8221;? Congratulations, you might be racist!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/04/26/quick-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legislating in bad faith</title>
		<link>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/04/26/legislating-in-bad-faith/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/04/26/legislating-in-bad-faith/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 05:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aerion</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/?p=539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can somebody explain to me how this new Arizona immigration law is not a blatant 4th Amendment violation?
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can somebody explain to me how this <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/24/us/politics/24immig.html">new Arizona immigration law</a> is not a blatant 4th Amendment violation?</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>The legislators who supported this law don&#8217;t care if it stands. They&#8217;ve already scored their political points. Brace for speeches in the next election accusing Democrats of taking jobs away from Real Americans and giving them to <em>brown people</em>. They even score a bonus by getting to blame &#8220;liberal judges&#8221; for violating the &#8220;will of the people&#8221;!</p>
<p><em>Yeah. This is a good plan.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/04/26/legislating-in-bad-faith/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Con-sti-tu-tion</title>
		<link>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/04/24/the-con-sti-tu-tion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/04/24/the-con-sti-tu-tion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aerion</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/?p=536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Minnesota Senate Republicans have introduced an amendment to the state Constitution that would require the legislature to &#8220;approve&#8221; federal laws before they would take effect.
A month ago, Virginia passed a law forbidding health insurance mandates. So did Idaho. Similar measures are on the ballots for voter approval in Arizona and Florida.
Proponents of these bills are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minnesota Senate Republicans have introduced an amendment to the state Constitution that would require the legislature to <a href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/57894/republicans-push-for-minnesota-sovereignty">&#8220;approve&#8221; federal laws</a> before they would take effect.</p>
<p>A month ago, Virginia passed a law <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-03-10-Virginia-health-care_N.htm">forbidding health insurance mandates</a>. So did <a href="http://gov.idaho.gov/mediacenter/press/pr2010/prmar10/pr_023.html">Idaho</a>. Similar measures are on the ballots for voter approval in <a href="http://www.ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Arizona_Health_Insurance_Reform_Amendment_(2010)">Arizona</a> and <a href="http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Florida_Health_Care_Freedom_Act_(2010)">Florida</a>.</p>
<p>Proponents of these bills are flying their efforts under the banner of  the Tenth Amendment, claiming to be defenders of  the Constitution. They seem to have trouble remembering the supremacy clause in Article VI, though.</p>
<p>This is really bizarre. I thought we more or less settled this whole nullification issue back when Andrew Jackson was president. Sure, after that whole episode, there was still some lingering doubt&#8230; but my understanding is that there was a thing from 1861-1865 that cleared it all up, from a legal standpoint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/04/24/the-con-sti-tu-tion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cheap thought</title>
		<link>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/04/23/cheap-thought-8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/04/23/cheap-thought-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aerion</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/04/23/cheap-thought-8/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama better remember his paperwork next time he does a campaign event in Arizona.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama better remember his paperwork next time he does a campaign event in Arizona.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/04/23/cheap-thought-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A whole party of Joe the Plumbers</title>
		<link>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/03/27/a-whole-party-of-joe-the-plumbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/03/27/a-whole-party-of-joe-the-plumbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 00:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aerion</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/?p=528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This NYT article chronicles the adventures of a band of recently-unemployed Americans who are relying on unemployment insurance and Social Security to keep them afloat while they &#8230; protest &#8220;government handouts&#8221;. The author must have had a devil of  time trying to keep the snark subtle.
Mr. Grimes, who receives Social Security, has filled the back seat of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/28/us/politics/28teaparty.html">This NYT article</a> chronicles the adventures of a band of recently-unemployed Americans who are relying on unemployment insurance and Social Security to keep them afloat while they &#8230; protest &#8220;government handouts&#8221;. The author must have had a devil of  time trying to keep the snark subtle.</p>
<blockquote><p>Mr. Grimes, who receives Social Security, has filled the back seat of his Mercury Grand Marquis with the literature of the movement, including Glenn Beck’s “Arguing With Idiots” and Frederic Bastiat’s “The Law,” which denounces public benefits as “false philanthropy.”</p>
<p>“If you quit giving people that stuff, they would figure out how to do it on their own,” Mr. Grimes said.</p></blockquote>
<p>I assume he&#8217;ll figure out how to do it any day now.</p>
<p>This naturally supports Jon Stewart&#8217;s theory of why crazy points of view dominate the news:</p>
<blockquote><p>People that have ideology, people that believe, that is their lives. The people that went down to Florida and taped their mouths shut and wrote &#8216;LIFE&#8217; on them don&#8217;t have <em>shit to do</em>.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/03/27/a-whole-party-of-joe-the-plumbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lovely parting gifts</title>
		<link>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/03/24/lovely-parting-gifts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/03/24/lovely-parting-gifts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aerion</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/03/24/lovely-parting-gifts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m not saying the reconciliation bill isn&#8217;t important, but scuttling it would be a little like winning the NIT.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not saying the reconciliation bill isn&#8217;t important, but scuttling it would be a little like winning the NIT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aggressivelyuninformed.com/2010/03/24/lovely-parting-gifts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
