Skip to content

Prepare to believe!

The Creation Museum is not above irony.

The Creation Museum is not above irony.

I went to the Creation Museum with some friends yesterday. I’d been avoiding it ever since it opened and started bringing shame to my hometown, but a high school (and college) friend had some company in from out of town, and somehow the Creation Museum wound up higher on the priority list than, say, the Cincinnati Zoo.

The museum is Buy 1 Get 1 Free all this month, apparently—that’s good because I was pretty hesitant about giving them any money. I think I’ll head to Union Terminal later and make an offsetting donation to the Natural History Museum. I haven’t been there for years, probably since junior high school, and it might be about time to pay another visit.

We weren’t a hard group to spot. I was easily recognizable as the asshole in the Obama-Biden t-shirt who was making fun of all the logical fallacies.

Hats off to the museum—they sure can put together nice-looking exhibits. I think a lot of the exhibits were designed by people with movie and special effects experience; everything was visually impressive. Also, there seemed to be a lot of gratuitous animatronics.

We’re right because we said so

We had some trouble parsing this sentence

As best I could tell, the thesis of the museum seems to be, “Science and human reason are subject to error. The Bible isn’t.” This, of course, requires that you accept the assumption that the Bible is inerrant. Various exhibits try to convince visitors of this point by arguing that no challenge to God’s Word has ever beenĀ  successful. (Never mind the underlying assumption that anything that appears to go against the Word is, in fact, either a divine test of faith, or a Satanic deception.)

Among my favorite arguments on the Big Wall of Reasons the Bible is Right were:

  • “New efforts to attack God’s Word regularly appear, such as The DaVinci Code, but their popularity is temporary.”
  • “The infidel philosopher Voltaire forecast that within a century no Bibles would be left on earth,” but he was wrong. (Yeah, they really called him a “infidel philosopher”—what a badass!)
Science kills!

Science kills!

Then, if that didn’t convince you, later exhibits resort to just trying to scare the shit out of you. There was a whole section of the walk-through decorated like a dark city alley, the walls plastered with newspaper clippings describing various tragedies. The lesson was supposed to be that moral relativism is evil, and that without the absolute truths of the Bible, your children will be raped in their sleep.

There was also a dark passage where Scary Noises were piped in, and clips depicting the Holocaust were projected on the walls. No context or explanation was provided; just a reminder that bad shit goes down in the world.

Later in the museum, the museum made its attack on science more explicit:

Without any absolute authority for right and wrong, humans in every generation have devised a multitude of excuses to justify abuse. Modern humans are no different. They have abused science to justify all sorts of evils.

Left unsaid is the universally-acknowledged truth that no human has ever abused Christianity to justify evil.

A “very good” creation

That's ... not how you eat those.

That's ... not how you eat those.

There were plenty of signs and plaques dedicated to explaining what life was hypothetically like before the Fall, as best as can be inferred from the Bible. From one such plaque:

Before man’s Fall, animals were vegetarians. In a “very good” creation, no animal would die, so there would be no carnivores. All the beasts of the earth, not just the “beasts of the field” that God brought to Adam to name, ate only plants.

This principle is illustrated by an exhibit of a dinosaur licking a pineapple. I guess the pineapple isn’t spiky because that wouldn’t be “very good”. (What I want to know is why couldn’t God have created a chaotic good world—or was he playing 4e?)

In a "very good" creation, no creature would have the Delta Brainwave.

In a "very good" creation, no creature would have the Delta Brainwave.

This “very good” creation idea was repeated all over the place (with minor variations)—so often that it became tiresome. I guess God created le meilleur des mondes possibles, in the words of my favorite infidel philosopher. I’m not sure why they were so obsessed; I guess it could maybe be a counterargument to the problem of evil (which I have occasionally called “The Epicurious Paradox” by mistake). More likely, the “evidence” in the Bible of what life was like before the Fall is pretty scant. I guess it’s only a fraction of Genesis, so there’s not that much to go off of.

And yet they somehow managed to make half a museum out of it.

What’s with the dragons?

The museum seemed to have an unhealthy obsession with dragons. I mean, yes, dragons are awesome. That’s one of the few absolute truths in the world. But what do they have to do with creationism or even Christianity?

The gift shop was full of dragons, probably because they're cool as hell.

The gift shop was full of dragons, probably because they're cool as hell.

The gift shop was named the “Dragon Hall Bookstore”. The gift shop had all kinds of dragon figurines and plushes. There were dragon statues mixed in along with all the dinosaurs in the main entrance of the museum. There was even a short film for kids about dragons.

Proof that humans and dinosaurs lived at the same time. And also robots.

Proof that humans and dinosaurs lived at the same time. And also robots.

Plaques in the dinosaur exhibit repeatedly mention that depictions of dragons throughout history are very similar to modern understandings of dinosaurs, in some sort of attempt to suggest that humans and dinosaurs lived at the same time. The argument seems to work something like this:

  • The flag of Wales and human mythology suggest that humans and dragons lived at the same time.
  • Dragons look kind of like dinosaurs.
  • Job 40:15 mentions a “behemoth”, which might be a dinosaur.
  • Also, God created all the land animals at the same time.
  • Therefore, humans lived among dinosaurs.

It’s a pretty outlandish argument, even by this place’s standards. Personally, I think the focus on dragons was (1) an excuse to talk about dragons, and (2) a gimmick to keep kids interested in the museum while their parents try to “educate” them.

There's going to be a test afterwards.

There's going to be a test afterwards.

Exodus

As we left the main exhibits and entered the Tourist Trap Exhibit common to all museums, we noticed a small table containing some stuff for visitors to take home and distribute to their friends (or enemies). As we were staring at a card that affirmed that the holder had accepted salvation (there was even a spot to sign and date it), a woman approached two of us and asked, point blank, “Have you developed a personal relationship with Jesus Christ?”

In my experience, this is not how normal people start conversations. We just sort of returned a blank stare, and she repeated the question.

This poster is supposed to convince me to convert... but it just makes me want to kill myself.

This poster is supposed to tell me that God can help me find meaning in life... but it just makes me want to kill myself.

I’m not sure why she felt a pressing need to ask us. I couldn’t tell if she was a museum employee or not—does the museum hire people to hang around the exhibit exits and just ask everybody questions like that? That would be kind of weird. Or was she a well-meaning visitor who had specifically decided to seek us out? And if so, why us? Was it because our group was wearing clothing indicating that we were, in all likelihood, evolutionists? Was it because we were audibly being assholes skeptics and making fun of some of the exhibits? … Was it because we were a group of minority heathens?

I have no idea. As I unsubtly slipped away, the other guy gave an awkward response and smile. She left us alone at that point, so I guess we’ll never know.

  1. hoppzor | January 3, 2009 at 11:42 pm | Permalink

    <3

  2. Legion | January 4, 2009 at 2:39 am | Permalink

    So, as an evolutionist, one of my exclusively evil atheist beliefs is

    “Death is a natural step in the cycle of life.”

    WHAT?!

    Did they run out of ideas or something or just decide to show some generosity and lend us one of theirs (oh yeah, because it’s EVERYBODY’S!)

  3. Pyrocide | January 4, 2009 at 6:09 pm | Permalink

    You live in a Horrifying place.